Using End-To-End Testing to Simulate the End User’s Experience

Testing techniques are an essential component of the software development process. Tests help to ascertain that the software functions well and does not cause interruptions to the user. If you have been wondering what end-to-end testing does and how it is beneficial, look no further. This article explores the purpose of end-to-end tests and where you can apply them.

What is end-to-end testing?

End-to-end testing is a method for examining software, it ensures that software functions as it is supposed to. It tests the various flows within an application which users may take from the start until the end. By examining all parts of the application, this testing procedure ensures that all components work together as part of an integrated system.

Building an end-to-end test suite can help organizations replicate a user’s behavior and interaction with various blocks of code, as well as many APIs at the same time. It could be as simple as a user registering themselves on a website or paying for a product online. The main goal of this test is to enhance user experience by simulating the end-user experience and approving the data integrity of the system being tested. 

Since most software systems today are complicated and consist of multiple smaller systems, a fault in any area can cause the entire system to malfunction. Such risks can be avoided by implementing end-to-end testing techniques. 

Usually, end-to-end tests involve a series of tests which follow an application’s flow and discover whether there is any break in the flow. A break is indicative of an error in the application. Engineers use testing frameworks to design and implement such tests on multiple devices. The tests that show errors are analyzed and codes are reprogrammed. Tests are run again to assess if there are any further errors.

What are the advantages of end-to-end testing?

The many advantages of end-to-end testing have led it to become widely adopted by engineers and developers today. It ensures accuracy by detecting a flaw in the coding of an application, helps to detect bugs in a cost-effective way, and expands the coverage of software tests by detecting all problems present in the subsystem.

End-to-end testing appeals to a variety of stakeholders. Company managers benefit from these tests , as it helps them understand how a system flaw could affect a customer. Those who implement these tests gain the knowledge required to prevent problems that could have a negative impact on business. Customers benefit from these tests as it enables them to have a smooth and hassle-free online experience.

When should end-to-end tests be applied?

There are many instances where applying end-to-end tests can be useful. Typically, developers prepare a list of features that a software needs to perform. Data flow in the application is measured to assess if there are any inconsistencies or flaws in the system. Developers are also tasked with monitoring the conditions which could affect the interface options prior to testing.

End-to-end tests are frequently carried out on fully developed applications and systems. Multiple tests are organized in case a bug is detected. In such instances, the developers need to assess the data that they find to understand the origin of the bug and how to correct it. Finally, they perform another test to make sure that the entire system runs smoothly.

Types of end-to-end tests

Two major types of end-to-end tests exist – manual and automated.

A manual testing format is where a tester pretends to be a user and attempts to determine conformity with the requirements of the application. This is done by carrying out a simple task such as enrolling in an event online. The tester follows the same format as any user would. They visit the event website, click on the event registration option, fill out contact details, and confirm registration. In this process, the tester tries to see whether there is any break in the flow of the registration process.

By comparison, an automated testing format is where more advanced tools are available to determine whether there is any fault in the system. Automated testing services are available for use on various devices which yield quicker results about the potential presence of a bug. In manual testing, there are chances of human error which could lead to inaccurate results.

However, the learning curve for manual testing is lower since it is easier to carry out. Automated testing techniques are more complex and take time to organize. While manual testing techniques need less financial investment, they may not produce authentic results at all times. Automated testing methods are more expensive as you are relying on sophisticated tools to perform tests on your behalf. Consequently, these tests tend to yield better results.


It is near impossible to run an accurate multivariate analysis to determine which elements are contributing to a user’s positive or negative experience of software. This complicates user feedback and software testing, when considering that user experience is dependent on the functionality and visual appeal of all design elements. However, it is not necessary to break your analysis down into multiple components. Feedback on the asset as a whole works adequately.

This is why end-to-end testing is critical to your software launch; aparting from preventing any hiccups upon launch, E2E testing gives you conclusive overall feedback on the state of your users’ experience. Organizations should focus on  implementing such tests to ensure user experiences are seamless and easy to use. It is up to an organization whether they implement a manual or automatic approach to end-to-end testing.